AAC COMMUNIQUE
Winter 2009
#500, 11010-142 Street
Edmonton, AB T5N 2R1
Phone: (780) 447-9420
Fax: (780) 447-2531
Main E-Mail: info@aac.ab.ca
Orders: aac.info@shaw.ca

Web site: www.aac.ab.ca

IMPORTANT DATES

October 29, 2009

8th Annual Leadership Day

October 30 – 31

15th Annual
Fall Conference
Assessment is...
Shaw Conference Centre, Edmonton

2008 - 2009 Executive
Deborah Rowley, Chair
Jean-Claude Couture
Darlene Montgomery
Wesley Oginski
Maureen Parker
Judy Williams

Executive Director
Robert Hogg

Field Services Coordinators
Anne Mulgrew

Assessment Services Consultant
Sherry Bennett

Assistants
Joey-Lee Morigeau
Miranda Leeder
Holly Miller
Jennifer Hogg

Specialist Seminars (Round 3)

  • March 2 - Central
  • March 3 - Calgary
  • March 4 - South
  • March 5 - Edmonton
  • March 12 - East
  • March 23 - Northwest
AAC Communique is also on-line in the Newsletter Archive at www.aac.ab.ca/news.html

AAC Members and Representatives

Alberta Teachers' Association
- Jean-Claude Couture
Almadina Language Charter Academy
- Rumana Haque
Aspen View Regional Division
- Brian LeMessurier
Battle River School Division
- Maureen Parker
Beaufort-Delta Education Council
- Roy Cole
Black Gold Regional Schools
- Neil Fenske
Buffalo Trail Public Schools
- Glenn Gouthro
Calgary Board of Education
- Darlene Montgomery
Calgary Catholic Separate School District
- Bryan Szumlas
Calgary Science School
- Jennifer Woodard
Canadian Rockies Regional Division
- Yvonne Machuk
Chinook's Edge School Division
- Lissa Steele
Christ the Redeemer School Division
- Gary Chiste
Clearview School Division
- Rob Rathwell
Coast Tsimshian Academy, B.C.
- Eleanor Charlton
Commision scolaire francophone du Territories du Nord-Ouest
- Marie LeBlanc-Warrick
Concordia University College of Alberta
- Mark Swanson
Conseil scolaire catholique et francophone
- Lorraine Robinson
Conseil scolaire Centre-Est
- Josée Verreaux
Conseil scolaire Centre-Nord
- Denise Moulun-Pasek
Conseil scolaire du Nord Ouest
- Linda Arsenault
Dehcho Divisional Education Council
- Terry Jaffray
East Central Catholic SSRD
- Ron Lindsay
Edmonton Catholic School District
- Brenda Willis
Edmonton Public Schools
- Kathy McCabe
Education/Culture/Employ., Gov't of NT
- Don Morrison
Elk Island Catholic Separate School Div.
- Aofie Cahill
Elk Island Public School Regional Division
- David Harvey
Evergreen Catholic Separate Regional Div.
- Rob Stepaniuk
Foothills School Division
- Lisa Blackstock
Fort McMurray Catholic Schools
- Kim Jenkins
Fort McMurray School District
- Phil Meagher
Fort Vermilion School District
- Kathryn Kirby
Foundations for the Future Charter School
- Lorie Skaper-Burtch
Golden Hills Regional Division
- Sue Humphry
Grande Prairie Roman Catholic S.S.D.
- Marlene Stefura
Grande Prairie School District
- Lance Therrien
Grande Yellowhead School Division
- Mike Allers
Grasslands Public Schools
- David Steele
Greater St. Albert Catholic Regional Div.
- Therese deChamplain-Good
Halifax Regional School Board
- Shannon LeBlanc
High Prairie School Division
- Anastasia Jorquera
Holy Family Catholic Reg. Division
- Dana Laliberte
Holy Spirit R.C.S. Regional Division
- Paolina Seitz
Horizon School Division
- Wilco Tymenson
Lakeland Catholic Board of Education
- JoAnne Jackson
Lethbridge School District
- Sheryl Hawkins
Living Waters Catholic Reg. Division
- Jo-Anne Lanctot
Livingstone Range School Division
- Ellie Elliott
Lloydminster Catholic School Division
- Glenda Kary
Lloydminster Public School Division
- Todd Robinson
Medicine Hat Catholic School Division
- Jill Wilkinson
Medicine Hat Public School District
- Catherine Usher
Miyo Wahkohtowin Community Ed. Auth.
- Sanila Mehal
New Horizons Charter School
- Ted Zarowny
North East School Division
- Amber Hester
Northern Gateway Regional Division
- Roger Lacey
Northern Lights School Division
- Roy Ripkens
Northland School Division
- Karen Penney
Palliser Regional Division
- Donna Dalby
Parkland School Division
- Ben Beil
Peace River School Division
- Carol Fedoruk
Pembina Hills Regional School Div.
- Judy Lefebvre
Prairie Land Regional Division
- Vonda Chatterton
Prairie Rose School Division
- Linda Matsumoto
Prairie South School Division #210
- David Hall
Raffles Girls' School (Singapore)
- Shirley Tan
Red Deer Catholic Regional Div.
- Lynne Paradis
Red Deer Public School District
- Judy Williams
Rocky View School Division
- Wes Oginski
Sahtu Divisional Education Council
- Steve Rose
St. Albert Protestant School District
- Lois Gluck
St. Paul Education Regional Division
- Patrick Rivard
St. Thomas Aquinas R.C.S.R.D.
- Pius Maclean
Saskatoon Public Schools
- Grant Dougall
School District #23 - Central Okanagan
- Hugh Gloster
School District #73 - Kamloops/Thompson
- Art Blackwell
South Slave Divisional Ed. Council
- Jill Taylor
State of Hawaii
- Monica Mann
Sturgeon School Division
- Mark Lockwood
Tlicho Community Services Agency
- Deborah Maguire
Trinity Christian School
- Lynda Hoffman
U. of Alberta- Faculty of Education
- Fern Snart
U. of Calgary- Faculty of Education
- Hans Smits
U. of Lethbridge- Faculty of Education
- Keith Roscoe
Westmount Charter School
- Martha Faulkner
Westwind School Division
- Roger Baldry
Wetaskiwin Regional Division
- George Ollenberger
Wild Rose School Division
- Tom Sperling
Wolf Creek School Division
- Gerry Varty
Yellowknife Catholic Schools
- Claudia Parker
Yellowknife Education District
- Mieke Cameron

Café 129: Creating a Community of Reflective Assessment Practice

When beginning our journey of "smerging"* data, the essential question became, "what data do we smerge?" As teachers, we are surrounded by data. But how could we make the numbers mean more than a raw score - not just a percentage, but more like a judgment?

As a staff, we began with our course marks; noting how many students we had below 50%, how many between 50 and 79% and finally, how many were attaining excellence at 80% or higher. We did full class as well as male and female analysis of these numbers. We tracked the data at least twice through our course and then reflected on what we had found. Initial findings by individual teachers included the following:
  • males were underperforming in ELA because our novels were focused on female protagonist
  • so the overwhelming factors contributing to failures were zeroes, with attendance coming a close second
  • males were stronger in math and science
  • females were demonstrating greater strength in ELA and social studies.
While not all of these discoveries were groundbreaking new research or even surprising to us as a staff, individuals began to pause and reflect on what was contributing to their overall results and how as a staff we could work towards helping students move out of the unacceptable range, or improve their overall performance. Our initial quantitative data, while valuable as a starting point, required refinement. We enlarged the tracking categories and used the following chart:

Class  
Semester/Date   
 raw score %
Excellence (80+)  
Approaching Excellence (70-79)  
Acceptable (50-69)  
Below Acceptable (Less that 50)   
TOTAL0 
This modification allowed us to focus on another group of students who previously had not been a key group for us. But with the goals of reducing failure and increasing excellence, it only made sense to start looking at the students who were close to excellence and see where they needed assistance. We continued to analyze full class, as well as male/female data to see if instructional changes were helping improve in our focal areas.

While the data collection and analysis is important, it is what we did with our data that was a key to professional and student growth. Initially, data collection felt like a chore to many. However, the goal of our project was for teachers to add one assessment for learning strategy to their practice on a regular basis to enhance student learning. This was in harmony with the teachings of O'Connor, Cooper, Guskey, Wiggins, McTighe, Black, Wiliam and others.

As teachers did this, collaboration began. It started small with "Café 129" (named for the room it was held in). This was not a staff meeting and there was no pressure to join. A few teachers got together to discuss what was happening in their classrooms - both instructional practice and student needs. As discussions continued, we realized how similar our use of data was and began to consider ways to use quantitative and qualitative data effectively to enhance student learning, and inform the effectiveness of our instructional and assessment practices. We began sharing what was working with certain groups of students and seriously reflecting on our grading practices.

As a result of our collaboration, we began to take risks and make changes with regards to assessment, data gathering and use, and instructional practice. Cross-curricular projects were developed. Second chances were given, a no-zero policy was established, common rubrics for performance assessments were shared and summative assessment experiences designed in common. Learning became increasingly student-centered and reflective professional practice was evident. The success of students was no longer up to one teacher, but became the common interest and shared responsibility of the group.

As we began to see improved results with these students, more colleagues joined the ongoing discussions. Teaching practice has changed. Student learning has increased because numbers were no longer the sole source of determining a final grade. "Smerging" data… more than just number crunching works.

Trish Hutton
WG Murdoch AISI Lead, Teacher
Rocky View School Division


* Smerging Data: Grading... More Than Just Number Crunching is a handbook for professional development published by the AAC that

  • promotes further thinking and discussion about grading practices and encourages the use of fair, reliable and valid grading and reporting practices;
  • encourages teachers to explore the difficult task of reducing a term's work to a single phrase, letter or number that goes beyond simple number crunching;
  • enables teachers to reflect on their current grading practices, examine issues using real-life vignettes, consider possible solutions, and make the decision either to continue with current grading practice or initiate changes. By the way, there is no 'answer key'! ; and
  • provides a model for how teachers, schools and jurisdictions can review and revise grading and reporting practices. Marzano (2000) advises that proposed changes be communicated to all interested parties (students, parents, district leaders) and that changes need to be well thought out and tested on a wide scale prior to implementation.
Developing Performance Assessments

In July 2008, I had the pleasure of attending my first AAC summer workshop where we devoted four days to learning about, and developing, performance assessments. This focused professional development experience was very powerful for me. I was able to interact with teachers and workshop leaders as we struggled through the task of creating performance assessments that would not only address the learning outcomes of our curriculums, but would engage the interest of our students.

I have been using performance assessments in my classroom for a number of years (more than I care to admit) but this was the first time I was able to truly see how the process of creating a valid performance assessment is done. With the collaboration of the workshop leaders and colleagues, we designed a product that was much more reliable than anything I had created before.

When I think back on the experience, what strikes me was the number of times that our group would have the "AHA" moment when an AAC specialist helped us to solve a problem or guided us to consider factors that we had not even considered. Also, the wisdom and diverse talents of the teachers in our group provided many opportunities for insight, inspiration and lots of laughter.

Although this is a grueling process that condenses much effort into a short period of time, I would whole- heartedly recommend this workshop to any teachers who are interested in learning how to develop reliable and valid performance assessments. What you experience will be amazing and will change the way you develop, and use, this form of assessment in your classroom.
Warren Hammond, Teacher
Social Studies 11-12
Buffalo Trail Regional Division


"Teachers will not take up attractive sounding ideas, albeit based on extensive research, if these are presented as general principles which leave entirely to them the task of translating them into everyday practice - their classroom lives are too busy and too fragile for this to be possible for all but an outstanding few. What they need is a variety of living examples of implementation, by teachers with whom they can identify and from whom they can both derive conviction and confidence that they can do better, and see concrete examples of what doing better means in practice."

Black and Wiliam, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London: School of Education, King's College, 1998b, pp. 15-16

Building Learning Roads in Our Brain

AAC Assessment specialists meet regularly throughout the year to share strategies and questions about assessment. We are usually provided with a reading that gives us an opportunity to expand our thinking and that can also be shared with our colleagues at school. Our fall meeting provided us with an article by Carol Dweck, (http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/oct07/vol65/num02/The_Perils_and_Promises_of_Praise.aspx) about how students with a growth mind-set believe that learning is possible with effort, as opposed to a fixed mind-set where students believe that the amount of "smarts" that you start with determines your success, and that amount cannot be changed. She believes that we can teach children how their brain learns, so that they can develop this growth mind-set. This includes helping them understand that repeated effort has more impact on success than just being "smart".

I also read Pat Wolfe's (http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/101004.aspx) book before she came to speak at the AAC conference in October. Pat Wolfe has studied how the brain learns from a physiological perspective. As an assessment specialist I had several opportunities to work through these ideas with my colleagues, but I wanted to come up with a way to help my students understand these ideas. As a music specialist, I have the advantage of teaching all the students in our school, so I shared this metaphor with the grade 2 to 5 children specifically and the younger students in a more general way. This is how the metaphor goes:

Learning is like being the first person to walk through our school yard after it has snowed all weekend. It is hard to walk and you have to take big high steps (which I demonstrate with exaggerated steps). It is hard work at first. As you travel home later in the day, you follow along your path, stepping in your old footprints. The snow gets packed down a bit so the walk is a little easier. Usually others have been walking along the same path so their efforts combine with yours to make the journey smoother.

At this point in the story I draw some dendrites on the board and show them how ideas travel from one dendrite to another and the more often an idea travels along that dendrite, the easier it is to remember. I then ask them to answer the question 2+2=4. The quick response of 4 shows them that the ease of that answer indicates a well traveled dendrite pathway.

We return to the path in the snow story and I explain that only the learner can make the path through the snow. The teacher's job is to provide tools that help with the construction of the path. The shovels, picks and occasional bobcat might look like strategies, examples, and assignments, but the actual learning or path construction has to be done by the learner.

It was at this point that a grade 3 student put up his hand and commented, "So if someone is talking when I'm listening to the teacher, it's like someone is kicking snow back into my path." That comment led to the extension of this metaphor of learning as road building in our brains. Hard concepts are just rocks and boulders that need to be moved out of the way. Concepts that aren't completely mastered are just gravel roads that need more practice to make them into smooth freeways. Not knowing something is not a measure of ability to learn. Sometimes answers are incorrect because the learner went down the wrong road to find the answer or needed a better map or signage along the way. Students who are not engaged can be invited to finish their coffee break, get out of the parking lot and get back to road building.

I have shared this story with my staff to use in their classes as well. In my music classes, where the subject is a foreign language for most, the children are much more open-minded about learning new skills and concepts. They are willing to admit that they don't know how to do things because they haven't had enough practice yet. Their brain might only have a gravel or a bumpy road so far. They are developing a growth mind-set. This metaphor provides us with lots of opportunities to talk about what learning is and how it happens, in a way that elementary children can certainly understand.
Wendy Davies, Music Teacher
Lochearn School
Wild Rose Public Schools

Voice of a Learning Leader

The following is an introduction to an assessment leadership workshop held near Whitecourt, Alberta on September 18, 2008. Robert Hogg and Dale Armstrong were invited to participate and provide assistance.

Well - here we are - gathered together as school division leaders to discuss a topic that is central to the role that teachers play and key to the educational experience of every child we teach - that being assessment. Arising from last years administrator's meeting where there was unanimous support to move the assessment agenda forward, there is no doubt that these two days will provide the opportunity to further develop some enduring understanding and address the essential questions surrounding assessment practice in our schools.

I would like to take this opportunity to welcome members of our Board of Trustees who join us in today's sessions. The Board has been incredibly supportive in proceeding with this important work in assessment and they, too, are interested in how we can improve assessment practice to positively impact student achievement.

Much of the research that supports the need to re-examine our assessment practices comes from Dr. Douglas Reeves who besides being an internationally acclaimed educator, writer and speaker - is founder of The Leadership and Learning Center, an international organization dedicated to improving student achievement and educational equity. Through its long-term relationships with school systems, The Center helps educators and school leaders to improve student achievement through practical and constructive approaches to standards, assessment, and accountability.

Reeves challenges us to answer the question - "Where are we good and why did we get that way?" Simply put - We need to know what ensures student success and increases the likelihood of its replication over time. One of the main factors for student success is a division-wide plan to assess students in a way that supports their learning and provides authentic information to the students and their parents regarding understanding and progress. Reeves support for assessment review is unequivocal. Reeves says (and I quote) "This path that we are on of assessment for learning is difficult, challenging, unpopular work - but it's the right thing to do." We will have the opportunity to explore some of Reeves ideas over the course of this workshop.

Over the past decade there have been many times when I have heard school administrators lament the fact that so much of their educational and instructional leadership role had been pushed aside by a myriad of management and reporting functions. These two days are dedicated to recapturing a huge portion of your role as instructional leaders and - make no mistake - your understanding of and commitment to redefining assessment practice in your schools will be the single most significant determining factor in any change that will occur! So I encourage you to be fully engaged as we explore the possibilities in refining professional practice and improving student achievement in Northern Gateway Public Schools. Our time together will be facilitated by two key individuals from the Alberta Assessment Consortium. The AAC was formed in 1993 and is dedicated to enhancing student learning through classroom assessments that both increase student confidence and enable them to effectively demonstrate what they know and can do. Currently, there are 94 jurisdictions that are members - including all of the Alberta school boards.

Our assessment plan begins with this opportunity to confer with AAC Executive Director, Robert Hogg and Field Services Coordinator, Dale Armstrong. Both bring their expertise and enthusiasm as they join us for the initial steps in moving the agenda for authentic assessment forward in Northern Gateway. Gentlemen, welcome and thank you for taking the time from your busy schedules to assist us in our deliberations. Let's begin!

Kevin Andrea
Superintendent of Schools
Northern Gateway Public Schools



back to 'newsletters' |