AAC COMMUNIQUE
Spring 2003

AAC OFFICE

#500, 11010-142 Street
Edmonton, AB T5N 2R1
Phone: (780) 447-9420
Fax: (780) 447-2531
E-Mail: aac@compusmart.ab.ca
Web site: www.aac.ab.ca

IMPORTANT DATES

October 23-25, 2003
9th Annual Fall Conference
Assessment: Drawing out the Possibilities
The Coast Plaza Hotel, Calgary

2002 - 2003 Executive
Darlene Montgomery, Chair
Jacqueline Skytt, Sec. Treasurer
Monique Gibeau
Ann Mulgrew
Cully Poston
Tom Sperling

Robert Hogg, Executive Director
Diane Toomey, Executive Assistant


AAC Communique is also on-line at http://www.aac.ab.ca/newsletters.html

AAC MEMBERS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVE

Alberta Teachers' Association
- Jacqueline Skytt
Aspen View Reg. Division. No. 19
- Brian Bittorf
Battle River Reg. Division No. 31
- Stephen Smith
Calgary Roman Catholic Separate School District No. 1
- Michael Ross
Calgary School District No. 19
- Darlene Montgomery
Canadian Rockies Reg. Division No. 12
- Brian Callaghan
Chinook's Edge School Division No. 73
- Jim Barritt
East Central Catholic SSRD No. 16
- Valerie Burghardt
Edmonton Catholic School District No. 40
- Monique Gibeau
Edmonton School District No.7
- Anne Mulgrew
Elk Island Catholic Separate Regional School Division No. 41
- Jim Sheasgreen
Elk Island Public School Reg. Div. No. 14
- Christine Romanko
Evergreen Catholic Separate Reg. Division No. 2
- Mal Malowany
Fort McMurray School District No. 2833
- Ken Saunderson
Fort Vermillion School District No. 52
- Freddi Bromling
Golden Hills Reg. Div. No. 15
- Ed Holt
Grande Prairie School District No. 2357
- Wes Brooks
Grande Prairie Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 28
- Karl Germann
Grande Yellowhead School Div. No. 35
- Judy Grigat
Greater St. Albert Catholic Reg. Div. No. 29
- Maureen Pawliuk
High Prairie School Division No. 48
- Laura Poloz
Holy Spirit R.C.S. Reg. Division No. 4
- Cully Poston
Lethbridge School District No. 51
- Paul Stevenson
Living Waters Catholic Reg. Division No. 42
- Carol Lemay
Livingstone Range School Division No. 68
- Ellie Elliott
Lloydminster Public School Division No. 1753
- Michael Diachuk
Medicine Hat Public School District No. 76
- Joanne Stickle
Northern Gateway Reg. Division No. 10
- Terry Sunderland
Northern Lights School Division No. 69
- Roger Nippard
Northland School Division No. 61
- Karen Penney
Palliser Reg. Division No. 26
- John Darroch
Parkland School Division No. 70
- Harry Wagner
Peace River School Division No. 10
- Barb Mulholland
Peace Wapiti School Board No. 33
- Paul Cincurak
Prairie Land Reg. Div. No. 25
- Christel Smith
Red Deer Catholic Reg. Div. No. 39
- Lynne Paradis
Rocky View School Division No. 41
- Wes Oginsky
St. Albert Protestant School District No. 6
- Lois Gluck
St. Paul Education Regional Div. No. 1
- Lorraine Tchir
St. Thomas Aquinas R.C.S. Reg. Div. No. 38
- Metro Hucaluk
South Slave Divisional Education Council
- Michele Sabean
Sturgeon School Division No. 24
- Darryl Reimche
Wetaskiwin Reg. Division No. 11
- Randy Risto
Wild Rose School Division No. 66
- Tom Sperling
Yellowknife Education District No. 1
- Claudia Parker


What is AAC?

AAC is a not-for-profit, partnership of basic education organizations. It is dedicated to enhancing student achievement through classroom assessment for learning. AAC is a registered charitable organization with membership consisting of 45 jurisdictions representing more than 80% of the students in Alberta.


What's Our Purpose?

  • to develop a broad range of assessment materials that are directly tied to the Alberta Learning Curriculum, are based on grade level standards, and will enhance student learning:

  • to support teachers by providing opportunities for quality professional and staff development;

  • to facilitate networking and sharing of knowledge, skills and expertise; and

  • to establish liaisons with other agencies


  • The Blind Educators and the Assessment Creature

    As I flew somewhere over the American mid-west en route to ASCD Assessment Consortium meetings in Alexandria, Virginia, I was inspired by the beautifully practical ideas of Thomas Armstrong. His recently published The Multiple Intelligences of Reading and Writing- Making the Words Come Alive (ASCD 2003) has the beginnings of a "learning trilogy." He retells the familiar tale from ancient India, "The Blind Men and the Elephant." He then added a less familiar story of "The Blind Educators and the Literacy Lion" that portrays what he describes as "'The Reading Wars' between combatants advocating a particular approach to teach reading, writing or both to students: phonics, basal readers, whole language, and critical literacy among any number of methods."

    I offer the following as the third member of a trilogy (Hogg, 2003)*.

    A king presented four blind educators in his village with a powerful, complex and sometimes mysterious beast and asked each to say what it was.

    The first educator was sent to touch the creature. Once he had done this he announced, "This creature is all about ranking and sorting. It is made up of accountability assessments with normative data flowing from its head to compare students, schools, districts, provinces/states and even countries. Accountability and selecting talent is its mission."

    The second educator took her turn to examine the beast. She returned to the king exclaiming, "This beast is truly made up of assessment OF student learning to account to others outside of the classroom and school. However, it is also made up of criterion-referenced assessments because they are the most fair and useful. The creature's mission is to provide information on whether students are achieving the standards."

    The third educator was then sent to touch the creature. He said, "Though I too agree that assessments OF student learning and their data flow from the beast, they certainly are attention getting! But there is so much more. The creature is made up of a variety of assessments FOR student learning that engage students, are vitally linked with the learning, inform teachers and encourage further learning. Its mission is assessment FOR learning that improves motivation, increases student achievement, raises standards and improves test scores of learning."

    Finally, a fourth educator was sent, and she came back saying, "The others are all shortsighted! There is more to this creature than performance-enhancing and accountability assessments. This beast is made up of entire learning experiences that students carry out for freedom, empowerment and the love of learning. It's about helping them know what they know and can do. It's made up of carefully planned curriculum designs with high quality assessment at provincial/state, district, school, and classroom levels. This means that at each of these levels there is supportive policy and well thought out assessment plans. Its message and mission is to use assessment to help all students succeed and become lifelong learners. We will know it is working when the assessments that are in place are ones that students do not want to miss!

    And with this final assessment, the educators proceeded to dispute heatedly among themselves about who was really right.

    It is time to end these literacy and assessment wars. Each creature is powerful, complex and mysterious. Each description that we receive of them - from educators, psychologists, brain researchers, and other professionals - can only enrich our knowledge of what these powerful beings are really made, and why we want so much for our students to have contact with them. (paragraph adapted from Armstrong 2003, p.11)

    * with appreciation for advice provided by Ken O'Connor.

    Robert Hogg
    Executive Director


    2003 Fall Conference - October 23rd to 25th - Calgary
    This year's conference theme is "Assessment: Drawing out the Possibilities". The conference will be held at The Coast Plaza Hotel in Calgary featuring two renowned keynotes. Tom Guskey is Professor of Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation at the University of Kentucky and is known throughout the world for his work in professional development and educational change. Robin Fogarty is known as "the teacher's teacher" focusing on brain compatible classrooms and problem-based learning. Educators come away from her trainings with practical strategies that transfer to the classroom the next day.

    The pre-conference Leadership Day on Thursday October 23 at the Coast Plaza Hotel will feature Dr. Guskey. The focus will be on how to foster quality staff and professional development for teachers in the interest of improving student performance and achievement through classroom assessment.

    Once again this year's conference will feature a diversity of sessions including in-depth workshops. In addition to breakout sessions, delegates can choose to attend one of three half-day workshops on Saturday morning.

    Registration details for both the pre-conference Leadership Day and the conference are being sent to schools through AAC jurisdiction representatives. To register use the conference Program Guide (brochure) or go to the AAC web site for on-line registration. Register early to avoid disappointment!

    Curriculum Embedded Performance Assessment
    Reprinted with permission from Data Based Edutrends, Issue 12.08, April 14, 2003

    With considerable classroom time taken for assessment it is important to not just sample learning with assessments, but to create higher level assessments that move students to greater achievement.

    Recent research examines whether students enrolled in classrooms using curriculum-embedded performance assessment show greater gains on large scale standardized tests than students without exposure to such performance assessments. One example of a curriculum-embedded performance assessment is a Work Sampling System (WSS).

    Designed for students from preschool through grade 5, WSS is comprised of:

    • developmental guidelines
    • checklists
    • portfolios
    • summary reports.

    Teachers' perceptions of their students in classroom situations are used as the data of assessment. Students and parents are involved in the learning and assessment process. What children are learning and how teachers are teaching is documented.

    Using this approach, teachers learn about the students' processes of learning by observing and recording interactions with learning materials, adults, and peers in the classroom. Teachers then use these data to evaluate the children's achievements and plan for future educational interventions, through comparisons with standards-based guidelines.

    The results indicate that:

    • students with WSS classrooms display growth in reading from one year to the next that far outstrips a demographically matched comparison group
    • these students exceed the average change shown by all other students in the district
    • the impact of curriculum-embedded performance assessment is not limited solely to those who start with either low or high skills, but appears to be universal with low and high performing students making comparable gains in reading
    • the pattern of change is similar though not as strong in mathematics, although it does not appear to benefit high and low performing students equally
    • the students' better performance does not result from instruction narrowed to the specific content of the assessment, but because instruction is targeted to the skills and needs of the learner using standards-based information which the teacher gains from ongoing assessment.

    Educators conclude that:

    • accountability should not be viewed as a test, but as a system
    • when well-constructed, normative assessments of accountability are linked to well-designed, curriculum-embedded instructional assessments, children perform better.

    For further information, see http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n9/

    Assessment Mini-Glossary

    AAC continues to encourage the use of a shared assessment vocabulary. Here is a mini-glossary derived from AAC professional resources and from a soon to be published professional development resource produced in partnership with the Edmonton Regional Consortium - Using Assessment FOR Learning: Strategies that Improve Student Achievement.

    assessmentcollecting information on student achievement and performance to improve student learning
    assessment for learningreceiving and giving ongoing information with students about their progress towards a clearly specified learning destination
    assessment of learningsummarizing information collected about learning in order to share that information with those outside classrooms
    criteriawhat you would accept as evidence that a student has achieved a learning outcome
    evaluationjudgment regarding the quality, value or worth of a response
    learning outcomeswhat we expect students to learn

    Assessment is an inference making process based on sampling… it is more like a photo album than a snap shot.

    Attributed to Brown, 1983

    The Power of Assessment FOR Learning

    AAC published a landmark study in January 2003 titled, The Power of Assessment FOR Learning. It is the final report of the first phase of an implementation study, Improving Student Performance through Classroom Assessment (prepared by researcher, Dr. Garnet Millar of GWM Consulting Ltd.) See http://www.aac.ab.ca/research.html for the complete report with appendices.

    The Alberta Assessment Consortium (AAC) provides tools, coaching and instruction in support of classroom assessment thereby improving student achievement based on curricular outcomes. AAC wants to achieve broad and deep impact on classroom assessment knowledge and practice by implementing processes and procedures that provide AAC products and services to increasing numbers of teachers.

    The 4-phase study will:

    1. determine the relationship between what teachers know and do with respect to their assessment beliefs and practices and the expectations of the Teaching Quality Standard;
    2. identify professional development strategies (pre-service and in-service) that enable teachers to build and internalize assessment capacity;
    3. determine ways to enhance the dissemination and use of AAC products and services in support of the attainment of the Teaching Quality Standard; and
    4. determine future directions that will enable teachers to build and internalize assessment capacity and enhance the value of use of AAC products and services.

    An area for further discussion identified in the report focuses on the assessment of "softer, more elusive skills"-"Teachers and others indicated that it is more problematic to assess the softer, more elusive skills, such as the ability to work as part of a team, communication/presentation skills and creative expression." p 45. (See Appendix F for information about creative factors and creative strengths- pp. 32-35)

    Current research identifies student creativity and imaginative thinking as the "next curriculum issue."

    Excerpt from Data Based Edutrends, Issue 12.09, May 12, 2003

    Increasing evidence shows that a "creative class" contributes in a significant way to the economic well being of many cities. Lack of a creative class appears to cause some cities to have lower economic results.

    Schools face increased expectations that they will develop students who "create meaningful new forms." This way of thinking is diversified among many professions, including scientists, engineers, university professors, poets, novelists, artists, entertainers, actors, designers, architects, nonfiction writers, editors, cultural figures, think-tank researchers, analysts, and other opinion-makers.

    Curriculum designers stressing imaginative thinking focus on producing new forms or designs that are readily transferable and broadly useful, such as:

    • designing a product that can be widely made, sold and used
    • coming up with a theorem or strategy that can be applied in many cases
    • composing music that can be performed again and again.

    The most effective school programs have students engage in creative problem-solving, drawing on larger bodies of knowledge to solve specific problems. Teachers strive to have students:

    • regularly think on their own apply or combine standard approaches in unique ways to fit a new situation or new context
    • exercise a great deal of judgment
    • try something radically new from time to time.

    The skill set of the future will include increased imaginative thinking and creativity.


    back to 'newsletters' |